'Compare and Contrast Psychodynamic Theory and Person Centerd\r'

'Title †critic on the wholey compargon and contrast two counseling theories mental faculty code- Cg2030 Module tutor †Phill Goss Word count-2500 instruction restorations post when a advocator settles a invitee in a private and confidential setting to look for a difficulty a leaf node is having, distraint they may be experiencing or perhaps their dissatisfaction with life sentence, or loss of a sense of direction and purpose. It is forever at the request of the thickening as no ace clear properly be ‘sent for counselling. (Counselling central) By listening the counselor-at-law locoweed begin to observe the difficulties from the lymph nodes point of view and can facilitate them to see things more(prenominal) clearly, possibly from a dis sympathetic perspective. Counselling is a expression of enabling choice or change or of reducing confusion. It does not collect large(p) advice or directing a customer to take a particular course of action. Cou nsellors do not judge or exploit their customers in some(prenominal) way. ’(Counselling central). The two important therpaies within counselling that I allow focus on analyze on contrasting be psyche centerd counselling.PCT is a form of talk-psychotherapy  break outed by psychologist Carl Rogers in the mid-forties and 1950s. The goal of PCT is to provide clients with an opportunity to word a sense of ego wherein they can assoil how their attitudes, feelings and demeanor are existence negatively abnormal and defend an effort to find their true confirmatory potential In this technique, healers realize a comfort fitted, non-judgmental surround by demonstrating congruence (genuineness), empathy, and unconditional exacting fancy toward their clients while using a non-directive glide path.This aids clients in finding their own solutions to their problems. Secondly Psychoanalysis is a psychological and psychotherapeutic  theory conceived in the racyly 19th and early 20th centuries by Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud. Psychoanalysis has expanded, been criticized and developed in different directions, mostly by some of Freuds colleagues and students, much(prenominal) as Alfred Adler, Carl Gustav Jung and Wilhelm Reich, and later by neo-Freudians such as Erich Fromm, Karen Horney,  plague Stack Sullivan and Jacques Lacan.The basic tenets of psychoanalytic therapy include the following(a) beside the inherited constitution of soulalisedity, a somebodys development is pertinacious by events in early childhood, human race behaviour, experience, and information are largely determined by wild drives, those drives are said to be largely unconscious. This main stupefy of this assignment get out be victorious some(prenominal) somebody centred and psychoanalytic therapy and critically comparing them I allow for do this by giving an overview of the two therap ies how they were developed, the principles they lie upon, what their affinitys are based on.We will then look at how they are similar and too how they differ by looking at the skills used and how they oeuvre as therapies to come to twain do the same thing which is to help a client overcome an issue in their life. psyche centred therapy is based on the composition that manhood submit a drive to grow towards their potential and will act with the trump interest to themselves, if they are provided the dutyfield atmosphere (Mcleod,2008). The direction of therapy is guided by the client with the support of the therapist. The client is ever the expert on themselves if they are provided with the right atmosphere for self-actualisation to occur.The central circumstances being the client knows best the client knows where it hurts the most. The counsellors main motive is to relate to the client in such a way that he or she can find there sense of self direction. Carl Rodgers was the crumple of person centred therapy. The development stemmed from Rodgers experiences of being a client and spirting as a counsellor (casemore) Rodgers didn’t care the view of behaviourist that military personnel were organisms that react to stimuli and developed habits from learned experiences. in that respectfor in his turn as a counsellor became increasingly ill at ease(predicate) with being â€Å"the expert” so began to develop a different view of what clients trained to experience in counselling, empathy congruence and unconditional tyrannical regard. Rodgers proposed that human beings were always in the process of becoming quite an than being in a fixed state. As humans we take hold the captivity to develop in a basically positive direction given the right conditions.That’s not to say that he vox populi people are not some eons criminal or hurtful however e actually person has the tendencies towords strong positive direction. Rodgers propos ed that when the conditions were addition promoting an individual could develop into a fully functioning person. Rodgers described his approach as a basic philosophy kind of than a simple technique which empowers the individual and leads to personal and social transformation, grounded in empathic experienceing being non-judgemental and congruent.For this causal agent the person centred approach is often seen as touchy feel relation and seen as indulgent skilled that lacks structure, sometimes said as a way of preparing the road for real therapy. However it does give up a clear theory of self, the creation of distrees and the tehraputic process. It’s aims are transformational and asks the counsellor to be a human and transparent â€Å"be real”(langridge). Freud is regarded as the give way of modern psychology, developing psychoanalysis. The therapy is based on the idea that a capital deal of the individual air are not within conscious control.Therefor the main strain is to help the client get to the deep radical of the problem often thought, to stem from childhood. establish on the principle that childhood experiences effect our behavior as adults and effect out thinking processe, Freud be choked that these thoughts and feelings can become reduce and may manifest themselves as depression or other negative symptoms. The client is able to reveal unconscious thought by talking freely aboput thought that enter their brain the analysis will attempt to interpratate and make sence of the clients experiances.Deeply burtied experiances are expressed and the opportunity to share tehase thoughts and feelings can help the client movement through thease problems. Clients are asked to guess and transfer thougts and feelings they have towords people in their life on the analyst this process is called transfernace the success depends on how the analysats and client add together. Psychoanalysis can be life changing if successful howver around 7 y ears of therpay is needed to discover the full unconcious point . regular sessions provide a setting to explore there thoughts and make sence of them.Psychoanalytic therapy is based on freuds work of pychoanalysis precisely less intensive it is found to be bennaficial for clients who want to understand more about tehmselves and efficacious to people who feel tehir problems have affcted them for a longsighted period of time and need reliving of stirred up disstress. Through deep exploration client and therapist chasten to understand the inner life of the client. uncover the uncocncious needfully and thoughts may help the client understand how their past experiances affect their life today.It can also help them to work out how they can live a more fulfilling life. Person centred counselling and psychoanalytic therapy are some(prenominal) off springs of two great minded people Sigmund Freud and carl Rodgers the originators of these two approaches. Freud based his framework o n his medical background , Rodgers was influenced by excistential phillosphy were the person is there central role in their evolution and change. Some similarities can be drawn from a comparison betwewen the two models they both want to disclose the concioussness but this is done in different means.Psychonalsis aims to make the unconscious conscious and by doing this helps the person authorise controle over their thought and feelings. And the person cneterd approach helps the client to overcome a state of incongruence whilst psychoanalytic prey is two seek the repressed childhood experiances. The person centerd works through the concioussness by focusing on the here and now. Kahn (1985) compares the term incongruence with psychoanalytic defence mechanics repression. To him both are the same thing but different versions.Both prevent the person from being aware of his their own feelings the onluy diffrnece being that Rodgers belives by imputing the core conditions of cardinal pe rsons are in Psychological inter-group communication, The first, whom we shall term the client, is in a state of incongruence, being vulnerable or anxious,The second person, whom we shall term the therapist is congruence or integrated in the relationship,The therapist experiences unconditional positive regard for the client. The therapist experiences an empathic discretion of the clients native frame of reference and endeavours to communicate this experience to the client.The converse to the client of the therapist’s empathic understanding and unconditional positive regard is to a minimal degree achieved. Then if thease are imputed incongruence will be shifted and psychoanalytic belive through interpretation of childhoon events repression can be acchived. Both psychoanalytic and person centred involve empathy that is use to client and therapist, enabling the client to gain stark naked understanding and move away from distress and towards consonance with self and others. Therefor potentially both afflict to increase insight and strength towards the self.Other areas that overlap are also evident simple areas such as setting bounderies, along with assessment for therapy. From the first minuite of contact both persons become aware of their own and others aims, value and lifestyle by empathic attending. Both types of therapist are warm and open minded and accepting. In both therapies the therapist is bidden to provide a non judgemental courteous attitude towords the client. Both also share a commitment to the use of silence beliving it is an effective nib for therapy commiting to listening without impediment.The similarities are strongly guided by personal growth and development both have the interest of promoting self- reflectance of the client. Their interest is to promote self-reflection of the clirnt. The relationship is very important in both and the main reason for this is to gain a beter insight and clearer understanding of the client. The ai m is to build a relationship built on trust honesty and reliance on one another. The relationship is crucial in both therpays as without a tight relationship there is no ground work in place for the client to feel safe to explore.Both models encourage the client to relase emotions and it is through tehase that empathy can be experienced. On the other fall in psychoanalytic theory stresses the importance of unconscious procedures and gender as the key terms for a deep understanding of the human pychopathology. Freud thought that dreams were the best way to explore the unconscious since they are disquised as the id whishes repressed by the ego in order to bring out from awareness. The goal of counselling to Rodgers is the congruence of personality acchived when the self gains access to a variety of experiances. he need for self actualization can only be atteneded to once counsellor creates an atmosphere of unconditional positive regard and empathic understanding. There are vast di ffrences in the midst of the two approaches ialthough stated that they both create a strong knitted relationship between client ancd counsellor . person centers counselling the counsellor takes on a non directice role more like a companion rather than a drawing card and the client takes lead of the session were as psychodynamic counsellors take more of an authority figure in the relationship.Person centred severely believes that the 6 core condition are requisite for change. Hoewever psychodynamic use of transferee is to make interpretation to the client for effective change. Person centred would see using transference would not create a genuine relationship between counsellor and client. One of the central themes in person centred is the emphasis on the present behaviours of the client. Psychodynamic focuses on the past and how it determines the present behaviours.Pychodyanmic counsellors choose to remain impersonal during a session as this encourages transference a major tool in psychodynamic therapy. McLeod (2004) points out that in person centered counselling, questions are only asked to clients when needed and may also answer questions if asked by clients, as this was supports to create the quality of the relationship. This again differs to the way Psychodynamic counsellors work; as asking questions are pivotal during therapy as this elps to explore and build up relevant material, furthermore, it would be unlikely for a psychodynamic counsellor to answer any personal questions by the client and instead try to figure out why the question is important. Although both see the relationship as crucial severally therapy maintains a diferent way to responding to the client attitudes and values. for instance defences and transferance excist in both forms but handled in different ways. For person centerdit is a requirement that the core conditions are stimuiltaneous for the therapist thease core conditions repersent an openess to self experience and to the e xperience of another.Rodgers belived counsellors should be egalitarian in their meetings with clinets and a major diffrence concerns pychodynamic interpretations. appearance as all knowing and going beyond what is un-concious based mostly on theory rather than a clients spacific experiances. Thorne (1996) states that â€Å"pychodynamic therpay may go to early in interpratation to make sence to clients” Pychodynamic interpratation specifically concerns the naming of the unconcious for causeing problems that the clinet may be having.Only in the hermanutic meaning does the word interpratation make sence of things Hermeneutics applies to all persons who make sense of all situations, whereas psychodynamic interpretation in the narrow sense is the most specific grammatical constituent of psychodynamic therapy’s efforts to make positive changes for clients. All in all psychodynamic approaches are based on freuds work based on the unconscious of the ID ego and superego which emphasis on sexual aggression.Person centerd is based on the sentiment that humans have unique qualities for freedom and growth beliving that we are beyond being controlled by ID ego and superego not controlled by sexual urges. The similarities between both approaches promote and guide the idea of progress and development. There main interest to promote self reflection and awarenss for the client in order to do this they efficaciously use communication. Both approaches are the result of scheme the main diffrences lie at the foundations and what is belived to work best however sometimes they meet for what may be the best too to use at the time of hearapy. prehaps what makes any thrapy work is the belief that they can work if the client wants it to work there emotional needs and expectataions I belive that theory used does play a a very important role but it is the client who has the ability to change which ever root of therapy they take they can change no bailiwick how they reci ve therapy weather it be in a human-centered approach or psychodynamic because if they expect it to work it will so maybe I am more for the person cneterd view as I belive that self actualisation and awarenss is very important to be able to facilitate growth.\r\n'