What Is The Expression Theory Of Art Essay -- essays research papers

Art has evolved and regenerated itself many times during our human existence. These differences are delimit through changes in styles under various theories. During the nineteenth and early twentieth century, a style known as Expressionism became popular. During this movement the artists were trying to example their ar cardinalrk as a tool of testifyion toward bearing. It was mainly governing in the nonrepresentational arts, such as abstract visual arts and music. It also was probably one of the most difficult movements to understand because the hale point of the enchantment lay within the artist. Not only was it a movement, it defined the act of art as a whole. From the beginning of time, to each one hold of art, excluding replicas, show a way of expressing ones self. Every artist puts a piece of his or herself into their artwork. Who really is to determine what that work of art was meant to express? One might ask, "Since most artwork is used as a way for an artist to express him or herself, what attracts this expression period anything particular?" On the general level "Expressionistic art, whether literature, painting, music, or cinema, often involves impetuous psychic disturbance and distortion in the perspective adopted by the artwork." "It is remote from the objective or realistic portrayals of the world, as well as from the happier emotions." To bring a more defined meaning to the overall system of expressionism, two philosophers play a large role. The first notarized expressionistic philosopher was the Russian novelist Leo Tolstoy who was followed by his counterpart R.G. Collingwood a twentieth-century English philosopher. Together they birth the two dress hat known expositions of the expression theory.What make these two analyzers meaning(a) is not what they agreed on, but rather on how they contrasted. They both quit that during the expression theory, the main concern was to express emotion. The one question that draws the two apart is "What does it mean to express an emotion?" They attempt to conclude this question, by providing the answers to a few others. What the nature of art is? Why we make and valuate art? Why the arts are so valuable?The best way to go about describing their thoughts is to state one of the thinkers discoveries followed by a thorough investigation of the seconds, beginning with Leo Tolstoy. He begins his arg... ...correspondent real life events. "If the music does not evoke a real stirred up resolution in a listener, according to this school of thought, this response should be considered inappropriate."No matter whose view you take they all have their faults. Making a theory on art is not the same as make a theory in science. With science you have guidelines that sight be proven. There are very few guidelines in art that can be backed up by fact. The ideal of defining a theory in art is based on emotions as well. twain Tolstoy and Collingwo od are using their emotions in order to judge other emotions. If I were forced to pick a philosopher to side with, I would probably tip off toward Collingwood, since he leaves more area for variety. He places more of the wealth of the emotional art within the artist themselves rather than a third party. If it were wholly up to me I would leave the decision on whether a work is good or not between the artist and whomever was viewing it at that time. What I might think as a good piece of work and what might evoke emotions in me might not do the same for another who might consider themselves experts, but does that really make my opinion less valuable?