Free Capital Punishment Essay - Criminals Need the Death Penalty :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Essays - Criminals Need the Death Penalty         Is the devastation penalty just? Politicians, lobbyists, philosophers, andexperts from all walks of life continuously debate this controversial subject.Has whatsoever one of these individuals listened to the rest of us?  The answer in many en strips is no.         The United States is a democracy of embodied officials, who representthe people, their wishes, beliefs and ideals.  That means, through elections, we finalize what policies argon to be enacted.  In the case of capital punishment,various poll report that seventy percent of Americans are in favor of the demolitionsentence.  That is a clear majority.  So called experts are free to petitiongrievances and utter freely according to our constitution.  But the fact of thematter is seven away of ten Americans have evaluated the dilemma of capitalpunishment according to their declare value s and beliefs.  Their conclusion wasfavorable to the death penalty.  At this juncture of time, the principal of it being just was answered by the majority - and the majority rules.         Many experts who verbalise against the death penalty cite it as barbaric.The definition of murder, according to Webster, is the vile killing of ahuman being with malice aforethought.  Therefore an unskilled person wouldclassify murder as equally barbaric. The mitigating factor of the death penaltyis, or should be, an already established punishment for this crime.  The killer volitionally committed the heinous act of taking a life, knowing they would besubject to this penalty.  Therefore, he decided to gamble on not being caught,or thought that he was above the law.  In either case he willingly forfeited hislife with the taking of another.  The killer whitethorn not control with Lex Taliones,but the consequence of his action were obvi ous.         While critics compete that an innocent person may be put to death, mostagree this may unfortunately happen.  However, we must protect the people ofthis country from killers, and unfortunately, perfectly of calling in the army, wehave tried all other options.  swell statutes usually allow the trial court toimpose death notwithstanding after a postconviction hearing, during which circumstances ofthe crime are reviewed.  If the aggravating factors prevail, the case isautomatically reviewed by an appellate court.  The accused may also call down thedecision or request a stay of execution as he sees fit.  Although the risk of anaccidental death is there, the legal proceedings are in place to prevent anunwarranted death.         An argument put forward by many is that the economics involved withcapital punishment is irrelevant.