Social Psychology

br OF EYEWITNESS , LAWYERS , AND JURIESOf all of the evidentiary possibilities a trial lawyer may face , the eye witness credibly carries the greatest cachet Against a criminal defendant , the proof of an witness greatly increases the likelihood that a defendant melt down be convicted . One study showed that without an witness , there was wholly an 18 percent chance of conviction with an eyewitness , this jumped to 77 percent . Juries believe that eyewitnesses ar accurate and observant , and that they keep their memories of crimes without distortion . Scientific studies contract found that of these are honest-to-goodness . Often , eyewitnesses are non accurate . The crime victim is a lot in a very poor psychic distinguish to observe accurately . The human capacity to distinguish and take hold data accura tely is vastly everyplace-rated . Most good view are not aware of how much memories change oer time . Juries tend to dismiss situationors that might show the inaccuracy of eyewitness testimony , while assigning great importance to factors , such(prenominal) as the confidence with which a witness testifies or the arrange of detail he imp humanistic discipline , that are for the virtually part irrelevant to the really accuracy of the testimony ( 93Psychology and Law - eyewitness Accuracy 94 n .dMany people go to curious lengths to rid of control panel duty . One of the most common is to admit that their business duties do not allow them to serve on jury duties . some states have adopted rules restricting the excuses a potential juryman brook use to avoid jury duty . States instanter use driver 92s license records rather than suffrage roles to provide a more representative cross-section of the tribe touch on in jury selection .

in spite of this , there is up to now a certain loyalty to the adage that a xii person jury consists of phoebe bird men drawing mixer security and seven women whose most daunting intellectual repugn in the typical workweek is reading the Soap opera Digest ( 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003Nevertheless , studies have shown that much of the criticism of juries is not borne out in fact . Recent studies have shown that the jury process does work sooner well , involving true Of witness , Lawyers and Juries Page deliberations in cases in which the jurors collectively feel that they are peers with one another , so that they share comparable levels of governmental and social sophis tication (Gastil , Burkhalter coloured , n .d )While jurors work stark to discern the truth , trial lawyers often seem confined on muddling everything . A good trial lawyer is proficient in the arts of persuasion . Lawyers study techniques of persuasion , care seminars and training programs , hiring coaches , and operative to refine their skills ( See , e .g , 93Persuasion 94 2007 93Using Storytelling techniques 94 2007 93Ulitmate running Tehcniques 94 2007 93A Primer on Jury Advocacy 94 2003 ) However , effrontery that the lawyer 92s credit line is the zealous representation of the knob this does not always suppose that the truth is being served . It can mean that the jury testament hear some wondrous entertaining presentations , but it does not mean that the focus...If you want to condense a full essay, battle array it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper